It is an ill wind that bloweth no
man good, and I suspect that future commentators will find that even in the lowering
sky of a viral pandemic there was an odd silver lining or two. I certainly hope so, for like so many others
I am left exhausted and jittery by the duration and uncertainty of the imposed
social restrictions, and seriously depressed by the national trauma
accompanying, and to a significant degree exacerbated by them. Here on our little acre we have already been
delighted by one apparent development, a redress in the animal kingdom that is
to a measurable degree humiliating some of the imperial claims of the human
species.
We live on a fairly quiet street,
though we see little of it, there being no windows facing onto it. All the house’s kinetic instincts, and thus
also those of its inhabitants, are directed towards the open and inviting land
to the back of the house, which features about thirty feet of wall to ceiling
windows, successfully designed to blur to a large extent the indoors/outdoors
distinction. Nature, which is highly
visible, seems very close. And since our
modest private property abuts a largish track of heavily wooded commons, one
has the very real sense of rustication: not quite Walden Pond, but not suburbia
either.
About two weeks into the lockdown
we became acutely aware of birdsong.
There has always been a lot of it in our yard, but suddenly the dawn
chorus was sounding more like a symphony.
Then there simply seemed to be more and brasher birds around the yard
all day. The traffic on the bird-feeder
in the atrium, of which I have a view from my study, suggested a sudden
increase in the feathered population altogether. Objective means of testing these impressions
were lacking, but people with whom we spoke often shared them. Then we saw in the Times a brief piece confirming the idea with regard to New York
City. The explanation was twofold. There was in the first place much less sonic
competition with vehicular movement virtually eliminated; so one heard the
birds more clearly. Then, too, the birds
themselves were enjoying cleaner as well as quieter air, and tended to feel
bird-frisky. And as you know, if you
read it in the Times, it’s bound to
be true.
And as with the birds, so also with
the beasts. Of the latter there has
always been a considerable variety resident in the back yard, mainly little,
furry critters: chipmunks, rabbits, squirrels, and of course the dreaded
groundhogs. All of these suddenly seem
more numerous, darting or waddling about the lawns, climbing trees, popping in
and out of stone crevices according to their various natures. Except for the groundhogs, which remain as
timorous as they are obnoxious, these little animals also seem to be growing
bolder, showing little concern for any human beings who happen to be sharing
their space. In insomniac moments I
sometimes hear the creatures of the night—opossums and raccoons—feuding or
scrapping around the garbage bins, and in daylight hours abundant spoor is to
be seen in places likely and unlikely, such as the flat tops of stone walls,
from which small, dark, shiny, dew-covered turds sparkle in the rising sunlight.
Above all, there are the deer. The deer are a perennial subject of
controversy in the neighborhood, and for understandable reasons. They make it very difficult to have a
vegetable garden without investing in expensive fencing more appropriate for a
maximum security prison. Though they
seem to move lightly and gracefully, their dainty hooves are specially designed
for smashing flower beds. What they eat from
those beds is a bit hit-or-miss, a favorite hit unfortunately being all
varieties of tulips, and practically any seedling of anything . (Daffodils are
safe, thank God.) People also worry, and
not unnecessarily, about the small deer ticks that can spread Lyme
disease. This is not a problem to be
pooh-poohed, as anyone who has suffered from Lyme will appreciate. But I am from Arkansas, and you don’t really
know what ticks are, or how to combat them, if you have never been to the
Ozarks. I tend to think that they are
just one of the prices paid for living in a beautiful place. Can you imagine Vermont without
noseeums? Of course my view that the
inconveniences of a vast deer herd in your backyard is on a level with that of
poor cell-phone reception in a national park is not widely shared.
Be that as it may, the deer herd
has been ostentatiously flourishing throughout the coronavirus pandemic. The fawning season, if there is such a term,
pretty much coincides with the sprouting of the bamboo recently covered in this
blog, and one frequently sees tinies on the margins of a squad of ten or twelve
adults. No fewer than three deer babies
have been born in my yard in the last three weeks. We are getting used to being a cervine
maternity ward. Faithful readers of the
blog may remember that we had a birth on our actual doorstep two years ago. But
now the numbers seem to me staggering. I
also detect, unless my imagination is running away with me, a measurably
higher degree of deer self-confidence and adventurousness. They seem to know they are now living in a
more deer-friendly world.
We had an
interesting “incident” a few days ago.
The guys who do the lawn, sort of, use a large and noisy riding
mower. While starting off on the front
they seriously frightened a mother and her fawn, who had been hanging out I
know not where in the bushes, and the panicked youngster fled to our open
carport and hid, for a time successfully, behind a piece of heavy printing
equipment stored among the chaos of the back wall. It took me some real effort first to find
this deer-child and then to free it from its dangerous refuge. The whole time the terrified mother champed
on the front tarmac. When I finally freed
the fawn, both fled, but not very far, to our neighbor’s lawn and thence to the
middle of the currently underused public street. The mother bathed her infant with her tongue. I suspect that the dramatic reduction in
vehicular traffic on the roads has been gratefully absorbed in the
consciousness of animals no less than in my own.
The speed
with which “my” animals seem to be responding to environmental amelioration
leads me to hope, against the global-warming apocalyptics, that the extinction
of Mother Earth would be much harder to achieve than some believe. And on a simplified, purified planet we might
even see the emergence of a new Peaceable Kingdom. A fox family has recently taken up residence
in the vicinity, and Papa Fox is partial to a short-cut at the bottom of my
garden. The other days I saw him
marching purposefully past a cohort of ten or twelve munching deer. Neither fox nor deer paid the slightest
attention the one to the other beyond, of course, the observance of appropriate
social distancing.
"And as you know, if you read it in the Times, it's bound to be true." Irony or simple conviction? I hope you will "unmask". My daily walks have been rewarded with, among other things, two fox sightings on the campus of Old Nassau. Just trotting along--Regards, Gene
ReplyDeleteA rather heavy sarcasm, I am afraid, and unworthy of my distinguished readership.
DeleteR. Bernstein, "Ironic Life" p.113 "To appreciate irony, one must have an 'ear for irony."" R. Scruton says "Irony is quite distinct from sarcasm: it is a mode of acceptance rather than a mode of rejection." I enjoyed your irony. More will be welcome--Gene
DeleteJust visiting: I enjoy much the same wildlife visitations and birdsong, a few houses up the road. I wanted to tell you that I recommended The Dark Side of the Enlightenment to a young professor and friend, who kept asking why historians don't write as well as Frank Manuel (my first recommendation). Her verdict: "More magnificent prose."
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDelete