Johnstown PA May 31, 1889
The evidence is in, and it is
clear. Once again, Iowans have
interfered in our national elections, sowing confusion among our citizens and
undermining confidence in our half-assed apps.
Among so much that is not yet clear is whether the situation should be
classified as major debacle or minor disaster.
I opt for debacle. As always,
perspective is called for. Among the
websites I frequent is one called “Word Histories,” run by an indefatigable etymologist, Pascal Tréguer. His specialty is the explanation of common
(and sometimes decidedly uncommon) English expressions, saws, and figures of
speech. One recent entry was “Don’t
spit. Remember the Johnstown
Flood!” While I doubt it is a common expression, I had encountered it
once before in my eighty-three years. I
saw it on a wall placard in a nondescript roadside bar around 1960.
I presume
you follow the transition here? The Johnstown Flood set me to thinking about
comparative disasters from an historical point of view. One is unlikely to avoid thinking about
current ones. So many are reported in
the daily press that papers really ought to have a special “Apocalypse Section”
at least once a week. This would cover
the body counts achieved by plane crashes, lethal fires, mass shootings,
earthquakes, violent storms, common or garden-variety homicides, and really
scary medical epidemics including, perhaps, opioid abuse. A recent headline on an article about the
fires in California and Australia caught the spirit: “The Twenty-First Century:
Age of Disasters.”
Getting back to the Johnstown Flood
of`1889, perhaps the first thing to say about it is that it was not a flood but
a tsunami. Johnstown is a small city
straddling a modest river (the Conemaugh) about seventy miles east of
Pittsburgh. A group of wealthy Pittsburg
industrialists and country club types had created an extensive private pleasure
grounds about fifteen miles upriver from Johnstown, a prominent feature of
which was the incorporation of a large lake artificially created by an inadequately
designed earthen dam, a relic of the 1840s, restraining the south fork of the
Conemaugh. Disasters waiting to happen frequently
tire of waiting. The dam failed,
releasing the hydraulic force of the Delta Mississippi into a modest but
rapidly descending stream bed. The
water-wall obliterated several river-bank hamlets before hitting populated
Johnstown. It killed about 2200 people,
many of whom suffered agonizing death in floating mountains of burning
debris. No need to worry about the
Robber Barons of Pittsburgh; they had excellent lawyers.
The Johnstown Flood was
prelude. The American twentieth century
got off to a notably disastrous start with the Galveston Hurricane of 1900—at
least six thousand fatalities, perhaps as many as twelve thousand. The comparatively modest death toll of the
San Francisco earthquake of 1906 comes nearly as a relief. But I have skipped over the Collinwood (Ohio, 1902) school fire with 172
incinerated kiddies and teachers and the Iroquois Theater fire (Chicago, 1903)
with more than 600 victims, most of them female, including many children. You may not have heard of this fire, which
lacked the “social interest” historians have invested in the fire at the
Triangle Shirtwaist factory (New York, 1911).
Most of the 146 Triangle victims were sweated immigrant women and girls,
not bourgeois Chicago matrons idling away a theater matinee, but the human
folly that lay behind the horrifying death tolls was remarkably similar in both
instances. I shall leave unmentioned the
fate of the Titanic (1912, death toll
1500 plus). We ought to be able to give
that one to the Brits. The main theme
here is American carnage.
Turning to “natural” disasters, Katrina,
the storm that went a fair way towards destroying the city of New Orleans in
2005, may have been responsible for upward of fourteen hundred deaths—a huge
number swollen by human failure and inefficiency. But so far that’s the worst
our century has been able to do. Superstorm Sandy of 2012, while visiting the
northeast with massive property damage, took only about 230 lives, by far the
most of them outside the United States. I somewhat arbitrarily place the attack on the
Twin Towers in the category of acts of war—not that acts of war are not
disastrous. But even Nine Eleven and the
“endless” Middle Eastern wars following in its wake do not raise the level of
the slaughter of the early twenty-first century to that of the early twentieth
century. Remember that on the first day of the Battle of the Somme
(July 1, 1916) twenty thousand British soldiers died. By the time the battle was “over” the figure
was 300,000. The death toll for the
whole of the Great War was about seventeen million.
Nothing seems more frightening than
epidemic disease, and as I write the country seems poised on the brink of panic
concerning the coronavirus infection first found in China and now showing up in many other countries, including ours.
The possibility of pandemic is real.
This is nothing to be nonchalant about.
As yet, however, the number of deaths is comparatively small even within China. Meanwhile “ordinary” flu, though seldom
mentioned in the press, has already killed about 8,000 in America. That might be described as business as
usual. There is by now a national
cultural amnesia concerning American mortality statistics for the Spanish flu
epidemic of 1918. They are uncertain,
but it carried away at least a half a
million of a population just over a hundred million.
The most casual survey of world
history should convince us that human life is a very fraught business full of
danger, difficulty, and lethal adversities of every sort. “Man is born unto trouble as the sparks fly
upward.” That’s in the Good Book. It’s actually something of a wonder that
humans have survived at all, but we are right now on a roll. People have trouble believing that broadly
and statistically viewed the human race has never been so well placed as it is
now. For example, vast numbers—really vast numbers-- have quite
recently emerged from poverty to lives of modest sustenance. This development is perhaps hard to see
through the smoky blur of Australian wildfires.
But a lot of us apparently don’t want to believe it anyway and are
encouraged not to think about it by a press operating under the simple
proposition that “If it bleeds, it leads.”
How I’d love to see a headline reading “For Eighth Consecutive Year
Nobody Shot at Alabama-Auburn Game”.
Dear Professor Fleming--My first comment since the "Scotch-Irish" question of now a few years ago. I have no quibble or question: this was simply informative, mature and--isn't that enough? Gene McHam
ReplyDeleteDear Gene McHam,
DeleteThanks for the nice note. Glad to hear you are still on board. Best wishes for the New Year. JVF