The Old High School, Mount Pleasant Texas*
There are
really two questions here. Should
college be free? And what would be the
effect on American higher education if college were free? The latter is in
my mind as important as the former, but I must leave it for another day. The issue of the moment is “free college”,
and it has arisen not in a context of educational theory but in the face of
economic reality. A college education is
expensive, and many young people have burdened themselves with crippling debt
in order to achieve it. Senator Bernie
Sanders, one of the two men who must be credited with making the tone of this
presidential campaign unlike any other I can remember, wants to solve the
problem by making public institutions tuition free. His argument in a nutshell is this. In today’s economy a college degree is
essentially a required entry-level credential for the adult workforce. Its role corresponds to that of the high
school diploma in earlier generations.
This is
true, but we need to ask “why?” The
conventional answer is that our world has become much more complex and
demanding, more high powered and high tech, than that of our forebears. The real answer, in my opinion, is that the
quality of our secondary education has deteriorated badly—in many parts of the
country disastrously--since the time of our forebears. We have in this country a virtually
uncontested consensus in favor of universal, free education; since 1918 it has
been a mandatory universal requirement. However
we no longer seem to have the consensus that free public education ought to be
good enough to create an educated citizenry in a state system competitive with
those of other leading nations of the world.
My parents were high school graduates, and proud of it. They considered themselves privileged. Many of their peers had dropped out of school at the first legal opportunity on account of limited capacity, disinclination,
or cruel economic necessity. My parents,
though faced with large financial challenges and the social upheaval of a world
war, could read and write, and never ceased to do so. If like me you have ever taught a college
“freshman composition” course you may find that claim incredible.
One of the reactions shared by many
of the first viewers of the Ken Burns serial on the Civil War, in which
contemporary documents were frequently cited, was amazement that the private
letters of so many of the common soldiers, not one in a hundred of whom had
experienced “higher education”, were beautifully written and rhetorically
powerful. At what Bread Loaf Writers’
Conference did Indiana farm boys learn to write like George Eliot? The answer is: a village school. Some years ago, when I was reading the
memoirs of W. T. Sherman, I was struck by his brief account of his early
education in a schoolhouse on the Ohio frontier in the 1830s. This education had supplied him with
sufficient mathematical and engineering training, by the age of fourteen, to
work on a surveying crew prospecting the path of a proposed new canal. On the humanities side, “We studied all the
common branches of knowledge, including Latin, Greek, and French.”
The last year for which I was able
to find complete statistics was 2012. In
that year there were 17.7 million students in undergraduate degree programs in
the United States. That is roughly five
percent of the national population. Of
these 13.4 million were in public institutions.
There were 4.25 million in private colleges and universities including
the (to me) staggering number of one and a half million in for profit colleges. This represents a very large proportion
of the cohort of high school graduates in this country.
That is, there are not too many young people who graduate from high
school but who do not go on to college.
Most people don’t even think of the high school diploma as a respectable
terminal accomplishment.
I am not so naïve as to think that
reclaiming the lost standards of American secondary education would be
easy. Perhaps it would not even be
possible. But with all due respect to
Senator Sanders, whose intelligence, sincerity, and idealism I greatly admire,
I think it would be both more sensible and more politically practical to try to direct
the huge financial resources needed to the free education we already all
believe in, than to apply it to a revolutionary new program of massive “social
promotion”. You should not have to go to
college to learn the names and functions of the parts of speech or to solve an
equation with two variables.
I first grasped the depth of the hole we
were in back in the Seventies when I found myself, in my early forties, at a
large undergraduate musical party with hundreds of young people mildly
lubricated with alcohol and cannabis.
The music was very loud and for the most part very bad. But the DJ put on the Paul Simon song
“Kodachrome”. At its opening words, the
crowd went wild. “When
I think back/On all the crap I learned in high school/It’s a wonder/I can think
at all.” I could tell that the
enthusiasm arose not merely for a song they liked, but for sentiments they
shared. High School was crap. And of course I had to think back myself. What I remembered chiefly were two rather
conventional and unglamorous middle-aged ladies in Texas, one of whom had
taught me the subtlety of the “formal conjunctive adverb” while the other led
me to grasp the sheer genius behind the periodic table of elements. I wondered then and wonder now whether in my
highfalutin university I myself have ever taught anything so effectively.
*photograph stolen from an engaging, stumbled-upon, and apparently defunct blog entitled "Exquisitely Bored in Nacogdoches" (http://exquisitelyboredinnacogdoches.blogspot.com/2007_03_01_archive.html).
*photograph stolen from an engaging, stumbled-upon, and apparently defunct blog entitled "Exquisitely Bored in Nacogdoches" (http://exquisitelyboredinnacogdoches.blogspot.com/2007_03_01_archive.html).
No comments:
Post a Comment