In the last couple of weeks God has been prominent in the New York Times, though mainly on account of His increasing absence or non-existence. This apparent paradox is to be accounted for by the immortal aphorism of Joni Mitchell: “Don’t it always seem to go? You don’t know what you got ‘til it’s gone.” A recent Pew poll made news when it reported, on the basis of a carefully constructed survey of a wide cross-section of representative Americans, that our nation is markedly less religious, and specifically markedly less Christian than it has been in the past. That is, more people are claiming allegiance to no religious creed or community and, specifically, the number of Americans calling themselves “Christian” is in decline.
The demonstration of the general
trend probably did not come as a surprise to most believing and practicing
Christians, of whom I am one, though published statistics always have a kick
that mere personal observation may lack.
Then a while later on the op-ed page I found an essay by Molly Worthen
entitled : “Wanted: A Theology of Atheism”. The
title of the essay was I presume intentionally whimsical, since a theological atheist
would be rather like a geologist who denied the existence of stones. But I think she grasps a very good
point that most atheist critics of Christianity miss—perhaps along with quite a few Christians themselves. That is that belief
is only one component of Christian experience, and by no means necessarily the
most important. One of course will
believe what one’s reason and one’s experience encourage and allow. But there is above all community of the broadest and realest
sort, reaching not merely across the contemporary globe to all sorts and
conditions, sexes, races, and tribes, but back into a deep history, far beyond
our capacity to see but still knowable to us through magnificent and beautiful
works of art, literature, and music.
Molly Worthen was advocating the stimulation of
godless community events, Sunday morning singalongs and the like. Like-minded people ought to get
together and give communal expression to what it is their minds like. I’m all in favor of that,
too. The American campus during my
lifetime has been the fecund mother of inventive secular but quasi-religious
mass meetings, political rallies, candlelight marches; and of course there are
always our elaborate sporting events, which may well come to be the center of
an emerging American civil religion.
I enjoy many such events and can get into the spirit of things.
Worthen’s op-ed attracted some interesting
letters. John Rafferty, the President of the Secular Humanist Society of New York
wrote in to say that his group already has community. They didn’t need singalongs. They get together “celebrating the good life”. One can hardly fault that. Socrates and his kids used to get
together in a somewhat similar spirit until the hemlock arrived.
If the question of
whether God is really on the way out interests you I can recommend a book that
I, at least, found most engaging: A. N. Wilson’s God’s Funeral (1999).
His subject is the Victorian crisis of faith—a familiar topic, but here
treated with extraordinary tact and intelligence. Wilson himself is the perfect man for the task. He is a master of the higher
journalism, the author of several fine biographies, and a man with a peculiar
affinity for the Victorian period.
Furthermore his personal intellectual history is something of an emblem
of his topic, as he has in a rather public fashion hovered between faith and
unbelief. Where he is at the
moment I have no idea.
The title (God’s Funeral) is actually that of a poem written by Thomas Hardy
in the first decade of the last century.
Hardy’s extraordinary conceit is that he comes upon God’s funeral
cortège “following in files across a twilit plain,” and joins it, sorrowing
more for his distraught fellow mourners than for the now defunct and
nonexistent supreme being. With a particular focus on the rich nineteenth-century
English cultural scene, Wilson’s book explores the powerful and it would seem
inexorable forces set on banishing theistic belief from the modern mind.
Thomas Hardy in 1923: He could never forgive God for not existing
Yet as Wilson points out, it is
reluctant to leave, and it keeps coming back. I presume that
Pontius Pilate considered the science “settled” some time ago. The Enlightenment, on the whole,
eschewed atheism, but the Deism it fostered was, from the social point of view,
pretty thin stuff, and it lacked staying power. The French revolutionaries, some of them, did their best to
get rid of God for good. They
pretty well succeeded, for a while, in getting rid of the Church; but that was
not the same thing. The Communist
countries adopted atheism as a state policy, but Vladimir Putin is now
practically kissing kin of the Patriarch of Moscow. Go figure. Things
are rather hard to predict, and Christianity in particular has a strong streak of what might be called
resurrectionism.
No comments:
Post a Comment