Showing posts with label progress. Show all posts
Showing posts with label progress. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 26, 2022

The Golden Age

                                            Peaceable Kingdom of Edward Hicks
 

If you’ve read Steven Pinker’s The Better Angels of Our Nature, you will know—or at least be forced to deny in the face of overwhelming if dull statistical data—that the larger trends in global human felicity are on the upswing.  I refer to such major factors as the ravages of war, famine, and disease.  The number of our fellow humans who have fairly recently “been brought out of abject poverty” is astonishing.  Pinker’s book is in line with a major though historically fairly new trend of optimistic thought—mainly since the Enlightenment—progressivism—documented in another once-famous book by the Cambridge historian J. B. Bury*.  Yet one would hardly guess the world’s good news  from reading the daily papers or watching the PBS News Hour.  There one gets the impression that major world trends have probably never been worse since the time of the Golden Horde, and that in our own country “democracy is imperiled” about the same way it was in Bloody Kansas in 1858.  Do not misunderstand me.  It’s not that I think everything is just tikkity-boo.  I think a lot of things are pretty bad—just not 1348 or 1793 bad.  But as a student of earlier periods of history I am aware that the human struggle has in fact been unending.   Twice in my own lifetime the pessimism has been tinged with apocalypticism.  When I was a child in school the terror was Nuclear Winter.  For my young grandchildren it has been Global Warming.  We are born unto trouble as the sparks fly upward, as the Good Book says.  What interests me in this essay is the alacrity with which spokesmen of the human race have embraced historical pessimism and continue to do so.

 

Having too little to do as he lolled around the Tower of London while awaiting eventual execution, the Elizabethan courtier and swashbuckler Sir Walter Raleigh dashed off an 800-page History of the World animated by his imaginative etymology of the word world: “that which groweth worse as it groweth older”.  Retrogressivism.  It is Raleigh rather than Pinker that my week’s reading in old poems has brought to my mind.

 

Among the great world myths, to be found in the lore of the most “advanced” of ancient peoples and in the least technologically developed of contemporary indigenous groups, is that of a Golden Age from which the human race has gradually declined or precipitously fallen in its ethical stature, moral grandeur, and state of felicity.  Usually, perhaps always, the transformation is the result of moral lapse.  Most famous of such myths is that in the Hebrew Scriptures—the story of Adam and Eve and the Serpent and the forbidden fruit tree.  In the early centuries of the formation of Christianity brilliant exegetes derived from this story in the early chapters of Genesis complex doctrines of human nature, the construction of the human psychological apparatus, refined philosophical concepts of the nature of human offense against God (sin), and the consequences of its supposed inheritability, often called Original Sin.  In the seventeenth-century the English poet John Milton, probably the best-known epic poet in our tongue, published Paradise Lost, announcing as his theme Man’s First Disobedience, and the Fruit of that Forbidden Tree, whose mortal taste brought Death into the World, and all our woe, with loss of Eden…”  For just as the human race was corrupted, so also did living conditions in our world become harsh and adversarial, and life itself a brutal struggle: vineyards into briar patches, so to speak.  The “peaceable kingdom” became the arena of human life “nasty, brutish, and short” in Hobbes’s famous phrase.

 

The pre-Christian myth of the Golden Age is alluded to by many of the classical Latin writers and treated at some length by the two most important poets among them, Virgil and Ovid. So consonant was it with the account of human origins in the Bible, the Roman myth needed only the slightest humanistic tweaking to enter the mainstream of Christian Latin literature, which it joined via various channels, but especially by way of a magnificent poem (early sixth century) by the brilliant poet-philosopher Boethius.  His greatest book, The Consolation of Philosophy is a prosimetrum, a work in which poems and prose passages often work in intellectual symphony.  One of the most famous “meters” (poems) in the Consolation begins “How much happier was that earlier age when contented men depended on the faithful fields and, not yet sunk into luxury, satisfied their hunger with easily gathered acorns.”  Felicitous, peaceful simplicity of life became deformed by the invention of navigation, leading to trade, and universal avarice.  The next steps toward depravity were bloodshed, wars of conquests, and the frantic digging for gold and precious gems.

 

  This short poem (thirty lines) of Boethius had a long afterlife.  It was translated or adapted by early poets in most of the European vernaculars—Chaucer included.  Chaucer’s “translation” is double the length of that of Boethius, and doubly pessimistic: by its final three lines the moral decline is so bad that nothing is left in the world but “covetousness, duplicity, treason, and envy, poison, manslaughter, and murder in several varieties.”

 

Boethius’s Golden Age meter of course derived from earlier Latin literary tradition.  The most influential of the classical versions are those of Virgil and, especially, Ovid.  Very early in the Metamorphoses Ovid traces universal world history from a Golden Age, ruled by Saturn under Astreia, goddess of justice, through its gradual decline into ages of less precious metals.  Things really got tough in the Age of Iron.  “Immediately every species of crime burst forth…modesty, truth, and honor took flight; in their place succeeded fraud, deceit, treachery, violence, and the cursed hankering for acquisition".

 

painful end of an era
 

The correspondences Christian theologians found between Moses and Ovid were not simply factitious.  Legends of the ruination of our once paradisal planet through human moral depravity are part of the shared stock of ancient Mediterranean and Near Eastern lore.  Virgil, widely believed to have foretold the birth of Christ in his Eclogues, could almost naturally become Dante’s guide to his imagined Christian underworld.  The end of the Golden Age and the loss of Eden are fundamentally the same old story of desire and rebellion-- drugs and rock-and-roll being long delayed afterthoughts.  The violent end to the Age of Gold came about in this wise.   Saturn’s revolting son--“Lecherous” Jupiter as Chaucer calls him—revolted against his father in a most revolting way.  He cut off his dad’s private parts and dropped them into the Mediterranean drink.  The result this aberrant act of coitus, after a certain period of foaming and bubbling, was the birth of the goddess Venus at Paphos on Cyprus.

 

Venus on the half-shell

Most readers probably consider it inappropriate if not blasphemous to find anything humorous in the scriptural version of the Fall of Man.   I do have to say that I find it hard not to smile when I read of  the first thing Adam and Eve did following the disaster.  They tried to get some underwear on, and quick: “and they sewed fig leaves together, and made themselves aprons.”  Maybe it’s just the Elizabethan use of the word aprons.  Once the goddess of love got loose in the world, all hell broke loose, especially when her very naughty kid Cupid was around.  It’s more like a belly laugh in Ovid, where one of the first events in the fallen world is Apollo’s mad pursuit of Daphne, the beautiful daughter of a river god.  You know about Cupid’s arrows, of which there were two kinds: aphrodisiac and anaphrodisiac.  The first inspires a burning sexual passion in its victim, the latter a terrible headache and revulsion at the very idea of sex.  Just for the fun of it, Cupid shot Apollo with one of the former and Daphne with one of the latter and sat back to enjoy the fun.  This led to a frantic pursuit and many great works of Renaissance art.  Just as she was about to be captured and ravished by Apollo, Daphne uttered a desperate prayer to be saved.  Salvation came in the form of her miraculous transformation into a tree—the laurel tree, thereafter the Apollonian symbol of poets and poetry.  As her tender flesh turned to bark in his hands, and her lovely hair a tangle of leafy twigs, Apollo was forced to reconsider his options.  “Well,” he said in effect, “if you won’t be my girlfriend, will you at least be my tree?"

 

Arboreal Daphne 

*J.B. Bury, The Idea of Progress: An Inquiry into Its Origin and Growth (1920).  A timely study: 20 millions, half of them civilians, had just been killed in the Great War.

Wednesday, July 21, 2010

Sensory Cascade: Progress or Change?

...the ever-whirling wheele of Change...

Some common phenomena almost universally experienced yet lack an identifying name. Everybody knows what déjà vu is, but what do you call that experience of searching for a word that is “on the tip of your tongue” but can apparently make it no farther than that? The experience with which I begin is one I know to be widely shared. You encounter a new word, a new idea, a new historical personage, a new medical condition, a new—whatever. You are sure you have never encountered it before. But all of a sudden the floodgates seem to open, and you are encountering it everywhere. This experience needs a name, and I invite my readers to make nominations. For the time being I’ll call it “sensory cascade”.

I awoke this morning with the vague intention of writing a blog about two aspects of progress. The first aspect, an abstract one, relates to the curious misuse of the word “progressive” (noun) in current political discourse. The second aspect, entirely concrete, or at least petrine, relates to the current state of the stone wall last mentioned on July 7th. I don’t ponder the linguistic history of the word “progress” very often. Hence I was somewhat astonished when I opened the editorial page of this morning’s NY Times to find an essay by one John McWhorter entitled “The Dreaded P-Word.” Definitely sensory cascade.

I won’t try to link the op ed piece, since that would force me, and you, to “register” with our national paper of record. Tastes differ, but I work my way through the Times editorial page very much in the spirit that I work through my morning laps, or might work through a session of head-butting a brick wall. The experience stimulates the adrenaline, and you feel much better when you stop doing it.

McWhorter’s essay is excellent, however. He is identified as a “contributing editor at City Journal”. This fact unleashed another sensory cascade, since until recently I had never heard of City Journal. But then out of the blue one of my most brilliant former students, now the journal’s managing editor, invited me to write a little piece for it. I actually got paid coin of the realm for dashing off a mini-blog. Since then references to the journal have been popping up everywhere.

Mr. McWhorter’s subject is the recent attempt of so-called “liberals” to rechristen themselves as so-called “progressives”. He is, I assume, a so-called "conservative." Naturally he has a political point, but he writes as a linguistic historian, and this is what gives charm to the essay. The vulgar understanding of the word “progress” begins with the assumption that change is in and of itself a good thing. This is a proposition dubious in the extreme. President Obama campaigned as “the candidate of change.” Not merely that, he was the candidate of “change you can believe in,” presumably the best kind. Change is dynamic and kinetic; change is hopping all over the place. Yet there is an aspect of all this that seems insufficiently considered. When the new president took the oath of office he promised to “preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States.” This is a commitment not to change but to an unwavering stasis. The Bill of Rights: the same old same old, since 1791.

Most of our ancestors regarded change, in the abstract, with something approaching horror. There are some fragmentary stanzas that we believe Spenser intended to incorporate into his Faerie Queene. They are usually called “The Mutabilitie Cantos,” and they begin thus:

What man that sees the ever-whirling wheele,

Of Change, the which all mortall things doth sway,

But that therby doth find, and plainly feele,

How MUTABILITY in them doth play

Her cruell sports to many mens decay?

That was the classical Western attitude to “change”.

One can make progress only with regard to fixed goals. If you are in Allentown PA you can make progress toward your goal of Keokuk IA, for instance. Progress toward fuzzy or ambiguous ends—“the greatest good for the greatest number,” for instance, or “affordable, quality health-care for all Americans”—is likely to be as slippery and uncertain as the ends themselves. That is, it is relatively simple to effect change. Achieving progress is something else altogether. I spent a good deal of the week moving a large number of heavy bricks from one pile to another some twenty-five yards away. I guess that is change I can believe in, and I now have a random brick pile that was once at point A and is now at point B. But you can definitely make progress when your goal is the completion of a stone wall, and this week I have been a progressive.


CHANGE

PROGRESS